Email:
Password: [?] 
  Register with the DACS
Site Search: Advanced Search
Search: Bibliographic Database(SEBD)      Lifecycle Database(SLED)    DoD Acronyms 
DACS Home DACS Services Publications Training About Us DACS Store Suggest A Link
Rate this page's content:
  poor
excellent


Case studies of programs on which verification and validation was used.
  • Case Study of the NENE Code Project - SEI TECHNICAL NOTE CMU/SEI-2006-TN-044, January, 2007, by:
    - Richard Kendall (Software Engineering Institute)
    - Douglass Post (DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program)
    - Andrew Mark (DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program)
    January 2007

    Abstract:
    he Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) High Productivity Computing Systems (HPCS) Program is sponsoring a series of case studies to identify the life cycles, workflows, and technical challenges of computational science and engineering code development that are representative of the program’s participants. A secondary goal is to characterize how software development tools are used and what enhancements would increase the productivity of scientific application programmers. These studies also seek to identify “lessons learned” that can be transferred to the general computational science and engineering community to improve the code development process.

    The NENE code is the fifth science-based code project to be analyzed by the Existing Codes subteam of the DARPA HPCS Productivity Team. The NENE code is an application code for analyzing scientific phenomena and predicting the complex behavior and interaction of individual physical systems and individual particles in the systems. The core NENE development team is expert, agile, and of moderate size, consisting of a professor and another permanent staff member,
    five post docs, and 11 graduate students. NENE is an example of a distributed development project; the core team is anchored at a university, but as many as 250 individual researchers have made contributions from other locations.

Suggest Supporting Web Sites
Related pages:
sidebar
sidebar
sidebar

s

s

s

s


SISOS cover
DACS Latest Technical Report


TEMS Logo
Visit the DTIC TEMS Initiative

   DACS Gold Practice Initiative ROI Dashboard
 
Acquisition Process Improvement
Architecture-First Approach
Assess Reuse Risks and Costs
Binary Quality Gates at the Inch-Pebble Level
Capture artifacts in rigorous, model-based notation
Commercial Specifications and Standards/Open Systems
Defect Tracking Against Quality Targets
Develop and Maintain a Life-cycle Business Case
Ensure Interoperability
Formal Inspections
Formal Risk Management
Goal-Question-Metric Approach
Integrated Product and Process Development
Manage Requirements
Metrics-based Scheduling
Model Based Testing
Plan for Technology Insertion
Requirements Trade-Off/Negotiation
Statistical Process Control
Track Earned Value
  Access benefit data from software technical and management improvements including SEI CMMI, PSP/TSP, Cleanroom, Inspections, and Agile Development.

View the ROI Dashboard
Copyright © 2010, QSI    Privacy Policy
This site is best viewed in Firefox 2.0+ or IE 6.0+
XHTML