Email:
Password: [?] 
  Register with the DACS
Site Search: Advanced Search
Search: Bibliographic Database(SEBD)      Lifecycle Database(SLED)    DoD Acronyms 
DACS Home DACS Services Publications Training About Us DACS Store Suggest A Link
Rate this page's content:
  poor
excellent


Parameter Definitions

  1. Project Identification An internally assigned identification number.
  2. Project Size Number of delivered source lines of code (DSLOC) in the delivered project. Source lines are 80 character source records provided as input to a language processor. Job control language, link edit language, data declarations, internal program data, and comment lines are included in the count. Unmodified reused code, test drivers, "throwaway" code, and external data are not included. Where the number of lines of source code are known but the content of the source code is not, the assumption has been made that the code meets the above definitions. Where the size of the code has been given in computer words, an arbitrary conversion has been made to DSLOC. DSLOC is assumed to be half of the number of computer words for high order languages, and equal to the number of computer words for assembly language.
  3. Project Effort Total effort in manmonths (TMM) required to produce the software product. Includes effort in management, administration, analysis, operational support, and other areas such as documentation, program design, coding and test; that is, all effort chargeable to the project by the builder.
  4. Project Duration Duration of project in total months (TM) derived from begin and end dates of projects, less any "dead time" in the project, for example, work stoppage.
  5. Source Code Languages Programming languages used on the project are recorded by name and are expressed as a percentage of the total DSLOC written in each different laguage; for example, Cobol 80%, Assembly 15%, JCL 5%. Where a Program Design Language (PDL) has been used to define the program, the total number of PDL lines written is included as a separate quantity and is not included in the DSLOC count.
  6. Errors Errors (ERRS) are totaled by counting the number of formally recorded Software Problem Reports (SPRs) for which a fix has been generated during the period covered by the project. Redundant SPRs are assumed to have been eliminated; that is, multiple SPRs reporting the same problem. (In general, equating errors to SPRs on a one-to-one basis produces a low count for all errors encountered during the software development process, since SPRs are usually not generated until the software comes under formal configuration control. This point is usually marked by the end of software unit testing and the beginning of integration testing; hence many of the errors detected during coding and subsequent compilation have already been removed. Collecting data on errors on the coding portion of the development process is impractical, however, and error data derived from SPR data can be extrapolated to the entire development process.)
  7. Documentation Delivered pages of documentation (DOC) include program listings, flow charts (low and high level), operating procedures, maintenance procedures, and any other descriptive material covering the design, development, test, operation, installation, and maintenance of the software.
  8. Implementation The implementation techniques used on the software project are recorded and expressed as a percentage of the DSLOC built using the specific techniques of Structured Coding (SC), Top Down Design and Programming (TD), Chief Programmer Team (CPT), Code Reviews or Inspections (CR), and Librarian or Program Support Library (LIB). For definitions of the above, refer to RADC-TR-74-300, Volumes 1-16, Structured Programming Series.
Additionally, several other data items, derived from those mentioned previously, are recorded for projects in the dataset:
  1. Productivity Ratio of DSLOC to TMM
  2. Average Number of Personnel Ratio of TMM to TM
  3. Error Rate Ratio of ERRS to DSLOC
Not every parameter has been recorded for every project in the dataset.


sidebar
sidebar
sidebar

s

s

s

s


SISOS cover
DACS Latest Technical Report


TEMS Logo
Visit the DTIC TEMS Initiative

   DACS Gold Practice Initiative ROI Dashboard
 
Acquisition Process Improvement
Architecture-First Approach
Assess Reuse Risks and Costs
Binary Quality Gates at the Inch-Pebble Level
Capture artifacts in rigorous, model-based notation
Commercial Specifications and Standards/Open Systems
Defect Tracking Against Quality Targets
Develop and Maintain a Life-cycle Business Case
Ensure Interoperability
Formal Inspections
Formal Risk Management
Goal-Question-Metric Approach
Integrated Product and Process Development
Manage Requirements
Metrics-based Scheduling
Model Based Testing
Plan for Technology Insertion
Requirements Trade-Off/Negotiation
Statistical Process Control
Track Earned Value
  Access benefit data from software technical and management improvements including SEI CMMI, PSP/TSP, Cleanroom, Inspections, and Agile Development.

View the ROI Dashboard
Copyright © 2010, QSI    Privacy Policy
This site is best viewed in Firefox 2.0+ or IE 6.0+
XHTML